StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Policy Claim: Euthanasia - Coursework Example

Summary
the author of the "Policy Claim: Euthanasia" paper examines the moral and ethical concerns surrounding euthanasia. The author also clarifies the meaning of the term, presents arguments for the practice, and concludes with a recommendation to resolve the issue.  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful
Policy Claim: Euthanasia
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Policy Claim: Euthanasia"

Policy Claim: Euthanasia Euthanasia, otherwise known as mercy killing or assisted suicide, has been a controversial subject for many centuries. Proponents of the practice believe that individual freedoms of choice that exist in life also extend to the end of life. They also argue that the sentiment of humane treatment afforded animals that are terminally ill or injured and are suffering should be given to humans as well. Opponents suggest that euthanasia is a ‘slippery slope’ that would allow increasing instances of coerced suicide, family members pressuring the elderly not to postpone their inevitable demise for financial reasons. In addition, the practice would lessen the urgency to develop new medicines designed to prolong life. Those who oppose the practice on religious grounds argue that it is ‘playing God’ therefore sinful. Health care professionals cite the Hippocratic Oath which forbids them from carrying out this procedure. This paper will examine the moral and ethical concerns surrounding euthanasia, clarify the meaning of the term, present arguments for the practice and conclude with a recommendation to resolve the issue. Euthanasia describes a situation in which a terminally ill patient is administered a lethal dose of medication, is removed from a life-support system or is simply allowed to die without active participation such as by resuscitation. A doctor’s involvement in the procedure could be to either prescribe a lethal dose of drugs with the express intent of ending a life or by intravenously inserting a needle into the terminal patient who then activates a switch that administers the fatal dose (Naji et al, 2005). Assisted suicide by physicians and non-physicians has been legal in Switzerland since WWII. In addition, three organizations within the country have been established to aid terminally ill patients. They provide patient counseling as well as the drugs for use in the procedure. Lethal injections, however, are not allowed. The unusual situation in Switzerland holds that assisted suicide is allowed as long as a physician is not a part of the process (Hurst & Mauron, 2003). Euthanasia has been legal in Belgium since 2002. Each case must be reviewed by two physicians before the procedure is carried out by either ingestion or injection. In The Netherlands, euthanasia has been legal for four years but has been tolerated for two decades. The guidelines for physicians handed down from the government include; “the patient must be suffering unbearably and have no hope of improvement, must ask to die and the patient must clearly understand the condition and prognosis (and) a second doctor must agree with the decision to help the patient die” (“The Fight”, 2004). Proponents of euthanasia are concerned with human suffering. Many diseases such as cancer cause a lingering and excruciatingly painful death. Watching a loved one as they wither away from the disease eating away at their organs is tough enough on family members, but to see them suffer even when drugs are administered is unbearable not to mention what the patient must endure. This emotionally and physically torturous situation is played out in every hospital, every day of the year but serves no purpose. To many, it is unimaginable to allow anyone, for example, a sweet old grandmother who has spent her life caring for others, to spend the last six months of their life enduring constant pain, unable to control bodily functions, convulsing, coughing, vomiting, etc. The psychological pain for both the family and patient is unimaginably horrific as well. If grandma were a dog, most all would agree that the only humane option would be to ‘put her to sleep.’ U.S. citizens are guaranteed certain rights but not the right to ‘die with dignity.’ This right is not prohibited by the Constitution but by religious zealots who evidently put the quality of life of a dog above grandma’s. Patients suffering from Alzheimer’s may not suffer physical pain but endure a different type of pain and usually for a long period of time. Alzheimer’s is a degenerative disease causing the patient to ramble incoherently and lose their memory. Many people who led vibrant, active and purposeful lives are remembered by their family members in this state (Messerli, 2007). Proponents of euthanasia also argue that the time of health care professionals, of which there is a perpetual shortage, especially nurses, could be used in a more productive manner such as on patients who are not certain to die. Numerous studies have established that understaffed medical care facilities provide a diminished quality of care to all. Those that could benefit from quality care sacrifice their health for those that are suffering a slow, agonizing and undignified death. The cost of health care overall would be reduced as people with no hope of survival no longer drain the available resources and manpower which translates to lower insurance rates. Health care costs have skyrocketed over the past decade and as the ‘baby boom generation’ ages, this problem will increase exponentially which does not benefit anyone. “Consider the huge cost of keeping a dying patient alive for several months. You must pay for x-rays, lab tests, drugs, hospital overhead, medical staff salaries, etc. It is not unheard of for medical costs to equal $50,000-100,000 to keep some patients alive” (Messerli, 2007). It’s a burden on everyone especially on the family that must pay it. Elderly, terminal patients do not want to be responsible for the financial ruin of their children, but do not have the option to call for an end. Euthanasia also allows for organs such as livers, hearts and kidneys to be harvested for transplant into otherwise healthy individuals with a potential for many more years of life. While it may be emotionally morbid to think of things in such terms, in a world where medical miracles can occur everyday that permit another human being a chance at a more fulfilling life, these considerations must also be made. In the real world, it is more likely that an individual will opt first to save the young child from an oncoming bus rather than an old man. By the same token, it seems incredible that today’s society would opt to allow a child to die so that a terminal patient might be forced to live a few more agonizing months. This, in effect, is the result of not allowing people to die with dignity. Many terminally ill people choose to end their own life to evade the previously discussed detriments of a terminal illness. Suicide rates are by far the highest among the elderly population for this reason. “If these people are going to commit suicide, which is better, controlled, compassionate doctor-assisted suicide or clumsy attempts like taking sleeping pills, jumping off a building, or firing a bullet into one’s head?” (Messerli, 2007). The unfortunate reality is the majority of people in the U.S. die a ‘bad death.’ A study determined that “more often than not, patients died in pain, their desires concerning treatment neglected, after spending 10 days or more in an intensive care unit” (Horgan, 1996). Most Americans (53 percent) believe euthanasia to be not only compassionate but ethically acceptable and 69 percent would support the legalization of euthanasia according to a Gallup Poll conducted in 2004 (“Public Grapples”, 2004). Opponents of a doctor-assisted suicide law often cite the potential for doctor abuse. However, recent Oregon and UK laws show that you can craft reasonable laws that prevent abuse and still protect the value of human life. For example, laws could be drafted that requires the approval of two doctors plus a psychologist, a reasonable waiting period, a family members’ written consent and limits the procedure to specific medical conditions. Works Cited “(The) Fight for the Right to Die.” CBC News. (27 September 2004). November 12, 2007 Horgan, John. “Right to Die.” Scientific American. (May 1996). November 12, 2007 Hurst, Samia A. & Mauron, Alex. “Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Switzerland: Allowing a Role for Non-Physicians.” British Medical Journal. Vol. 326, N. 7383, (February 1, 2003): 271-273. Messerli, Joe. “Should an incurably-ill patient be able to commit physician-assisted suicide?” Balanced Politics. (March 4, 2007). November 12, 2007 Naji, Mostafa H; Lazarine, Neil G. & Pugh, Meredith D. “Euthanasia, the Terminal Patient and the Physician’s Role.” Journal of Religion and Health. Vol. 20, N. 3, (September 1981): 186-200. “Public Grapples With Legality, Morality of Euthanasia.” The Gallup Poll. (13 July 2004). Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Policy Claim: Euthanasia

Voluntary Active Euthanasia

This paper ''Voluntary Active euthanasia'' tells that the debate has become more heated in terms of whether voluntary active euthanasia should be legalized.... The legalization of euthanasia would have a difficult task ahead of it, but such legalization would not be impossible, and would also be beneficial to society as a whole....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Law and Euthanasia, British House of Lords

Law and euthanasia.... Law and euthanasia Law and euthanasia Terminal illness or disease is a medical term that found its popularity in the 20th century.... Ending lives of persons suffering from terminal diseases is often referred to euthanasia or dying with dignity.... euthanasia is usually regulated by law and different countries have different laws and regulation to such deaths.... British House of Lords delegated the responsibilities regarding to euthanasia to its committee on the Medical Ethics (Jackson, 2005; Pg....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

In Defense of Voluntary Euthanasia

In the paper 'In Defense of Voluntary euthanasia' the author focuses on euthanasia, which is today once again being debated.... In the case of Hook, he presents a rebuttal only once, early in the article, by relating his experience where his suffering had led him to ask for euthanasia, which was denied, and all turned out well.... In the other article, Singer and Siegler present evidence and a series of rebuttals, points in justification of euthanasia, for example, the case of Netherlands....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Acute Euthanasia

The word ‘euthanasia' means ‘a good death', and as the name implies, euthanasia implies an easy death without intense pain or suffering (Cavan & Dolan 8).... Going by its literal translation, euthanasia appears to be something good, as anything that can alleviate pain and.... However, euthanasia is one of the most highly charged and widely debated subjects of the century.... euthanasia is sometimes also called imposed death, mercy death and assisted suicide....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Pros and Cons of Euthanasia

The essay "Pros and Cons of euthanasia" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues in the pros and cons of euthanasia.... euthanasia refers to the act of ending the life of terminally ill patients by lethal injection or denying the patients necessities, like food or water.... euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or incurable disease by either lethal injection or suspension of treatment....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Euthanasia is Inherently Wrong

Nevertheless, euthanasia is not only an easy death.... euthanasia is simply, killing.... This essay argues the belief that euthanasia is a right choice.... This essay tries to prove that euthanasia is immoral.... It is naturally immoral, but is also not right to interpret euthanasia from the perspectives of self-centeredness and of convenience.... Before laying down arguments against such belief, it would be important to provide an accurate definition of ‘euthanasia'....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Euthanasia: Should it really be practiced

This essay describes euthanasia, or what is also called mercy-killing, is the practice of intentionally ending a life with the intent of relieving pain.... euthanasia is also referred to as assisted suicide at times.... Opponents of euthanasia cite the possibility of fraud and abuse in administration of the practice.... The same can be done for euthanasia.... he sanctity of life is a religious argument opponents put forward against euthanasia....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Voluntary and Non-Voluntary Euthanasia

This study 'Voluntary and Non-Voluntary euthanasia' will shed more light on active and passive euthanasia.... Voluntary euthanasia involves ending a patient's life after a mutual agreement between the physician and the patient, non-voluntary occur is when the patient's life is taken without his consent.... The author states that the euthanasia debate has persisted for a long time whereby based on the current situation there is concrete proof this topic still has a long way to go....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us