StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Tale of Victor Frankenstein - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay 'Tale of Victor Frankenstein' analyzes classic tale of horror and darkness, set in the wilderness areas of Europe, particularly Switzerland. It is not a tale designed simply to arouse fear in the heart of the reader. Instead, it is designed to make the reader think about several issues…
Download free paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful
Tale of Victor Frankenstein
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Tale of Victor Frankenstein"

The Pursuit of Knowledge: A Tempting Evil Mary Shelley’s masterpiece work, Frankenstein, is a ic tale of horror and darkness, set in the wilderness areas of Europe, particularly Switzerland. Unlike the interpretations familiar to the Hollywood movie set, this novel is focused more upon the drama that occurs as Frankenstein’s creature searches for love and acceptance and instead finds only rejection and revulsion, finally taking out his frustrations in revenge against his creator. However, it is not a tale designed simply to arouse fear in the heart of the reader. Instead, it is designed to make the reader think about a number of issues. Written in 1818, the novel presupposes many of the issues that would be raised within literature and science in the years to come, such as the novel The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde written by Robert Louis Stevenson in 1886. In this story, another scientist discovers a potion that enables him to separate himself into two distinct personalities. The purpose of this potion was to provide the scientist with a means of separating the good portion of his nature from the evil, but the evil proves too enticing and he becomes completely unable to control it or withstand it. In the end, the good doctor loses his life in abandoning himself to the strength of the monstrous evil portion of his being. In both cases, normal men bring about tremendous evil on the world as a result of their investigations into “unscientific balderdash” or otherwise unfounded arcane knowledge. Thus, through both of these stories, the authors illustrate how the pursuit of such forbidden knowledge is the well-spring of evil. A great deal of the Western world has been raised with the belief that the pursuit of deep knowledge such as that investigated by Victor Frankenstein in Shelley’s novel is the source of all evil. This idea stems from the Garden of Eden in which Eve, the first woman, stole an apple from the Tree of Knowledge, causing the downfall of all mankind. From the beginning of his studies, Victor Frankenstein purposefully and intentionally turned his back on the natural world as a means of concentrating on discovering the secret of bringing life to inanimate material, a process in which he was “forced to spend days and night in vaults and charnel-houses. My attention was fixed upon every object the most insupportable to the delicacy of the human feelings” (Shelley, 1993: 45) while “my eyes were insensible to the charms of nature” (Shelley, 1993: 49). Despite the warnings he’d received and the obvious challenge to the natural order of things, Frankenstein continued his search for deep knowledge, continued to work on the creature he had started, continued to envision it as a beautiful thing that would give all homage to him and remained unable to foresee the true nature of what he was doing until it was too late and the living monster stood facing him in all its horrendous grotesqueness. Although he creates the monster, he cannot bear to look upon him and becomes so ill following the creature’s animation that he requires long-term care by his friend Cherval before he is fit enough to travel. Frankenstein, having created something so hideous he can’t bear himself to look upon it, abandons his creation and allows it to enter the world unprotected, uncared for and misunderstood at every turn; essentially dooming his creature to eternal loneliness in his monstrosity. This feeling of utter disregard for the well-being of the created wells up immediately upon the creature’s first breath of life. “The beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room” (42). Frankenstein only agrees to discuss things with the monster once the threat has been made to his family, forcing the monster to violence as the only means to gain an ear. The creature Frankenstein creates is not as immediately obviously evil. The monster comes into life with a gentle spirit and a predilection for loving the natural things of the world. As the spring warmed the earth during the monster’s stay outside the De Lacey home where he gained the learning he should have gained from Frankenstein, the monster tells Frankenstein “my spirits were elevated by the enchanting appearance of nature; the past was blotted from my memory, the present was tranquil, and the future gilded by bright rays of hope and anticipations of joy” (119). However, his monstrous appearance ensures he is chased from every possible place of refuge and human companionship. After he is chased even from this loving and patient home, the monster becomes possessed by thoughts of revenge against his creator for making him so unacceptable to any kind of company. Even in the silent places, the monster was unable to avoid negative human interaction, becoming injured as he struggles to save a woman from being swept away by a spring-fed stream. Thus, he becomes convinced that there is no where and no place for him to be happy as long as normal humans are present. With his final hope for happiness thwarted in Frankenstein’s refusal to create a companion for him, the monster then dedicates himself completely to evil, primarily as it pertained to the family of Frankenstein. In the end, the creature tells Walton, ”I had cast off all feeling, subdued all anguish, to riot in the excess of my despair. Evil thenceforth became my good. Urged thus far, I had no choice but to adapt my nature to an element which I had willingly chosen” (239). Unlike Frankenstein’s monster, the evil in Mr. Hyde is immediately apparent upon his first entrance into the story as the talk of the town after he trampled a young girl in the street. “It sounds like nothing to hear, but it was hellish to see. It wasn’t like a man, it was like some damned Juggernaut” (5). Because of the nature of Hyde’s appearance, this creation was left without any kind of conscience or other reason to restrain his actions and was thus free to commit any sort of evil he might choose to engage. Regardless of what the respectable and good-hearted Dr. Jekyll might have felt about these actions, Hyde was capable of carrying them out without feeling any remorse or guilt. He is also able to completely throw himself into his evil as this same incident illustrates, “And next moment, with ape-like fury, he was trampling his victim under foot” (21). Like Frankenstein’s monster, the creature that emerges with the help of Dr. Jekyll’s potion takes on an evil appearance that marks him as evil. While this wasn’t necessarily the case in Frankenstein, it is more than evident within the character of Mr. Hyde. This man, much different from Dr. Jekyll, appears as primitive to many people, even being referred to at one point as a troglodyte. This appearance was not tempered any by Mr. Hyde’s habitual interaction with others. In an age when manners and comportment were of primary importance in determining the worth of the individual, Mr. Hyde made it a point to forego such niceties. As Mr. Enfield tells Mr. Utterson, “my man was a fellow that nobody could have to do with, a really damnable man; and the person that drew the cheque is the very pink of the proprieties, celebrated too, and (what makes it worse) one of your fellows who do what they call good” (6). This illustrates not only the evil of the man Mr. Hyde, but also the level to which manners and proper behavior were held sacred and the effect such a person might have upon the reputation and good-standing of the people they may come into contact with. Although Dr. Jekyll struggled to contain the evil nature within himself, he increasingly found himself losing control to the freedom and guiltlessness of his alter-ego. As the story progresses, Dr. Jekyll is seen to exercise some control over the creature by stopping the potion, but the evil, once released, cannot be so easily contained. Mr. Hyde begins emerging in Dr. Jekyll’s sleep and, once released, this constrained evil bursts out in even greater force, this time committing murder. The details provided from the maid’s story indicate that “all of a sudden he [Mr. Hyde] broke out in a great flame of anger, stamping with his foot, brandishing the cane, and carrying on (as the maid described it) like a madman.  The old gentleman took a step back, with the air of one very much surprised and a trifle hurt; and at that Mr. Hyde broke out of all bounds and clubbed him to the earth.  And next moment, with ape-like fury, he was trampling his victim under foot and hailing down a storm of blows, under which the bones were audibly shattered and the body jumped upon the roadway” (Ch. 4). Mr. Hyde’s ability to completely take over the form of Dr. Jekyll, regardless of whether the potion has been taken or not and regardless of the level of Dr. Jekyll’s awareness, eventually emerging even during the day, leads Dr. Jekyll to the conclusion that his life is over with the close of his final letter as his body becomes completely inhabited by Mr. Hyde. It is perhaps his last act of goodness that causes Mr. Hyde to commit suicide rather than emerging from the Doctor’s laboratory to commit brutal and consistent evil on the city until the time he is caught. Thus, in both tales, the same concept is developed that a search for the deeper levels of knowledge that science was then plunging into were, in reality, doing little more than loosing a great deal of evil upon the world. Frankenstein is seen to convert his own previously sweet and mild-tempered attention onto evil pursuits as he carelessly engages in activities that would make the normal man ill and produces something monstrous in form. This creature that is thus loosed on the world has little choice but to turn to evil to be heard and thus commits a great deal more mischief as he targets innocent victims for his rage. The same can be said of Dr. Jekyll as he seeks a means of removing evil from the world and instead opens a new door through which it might enter. Mr. Hyde is evil by design and, like Frankenstein’s monster, eventually gains mastery over his maker, highlighting the concept that evil, once realized, cannot simply be put back into the box from which it was found. Works Cited Shelley, Mary. The Essential Frankenstein. Leonard Wolf (Ed.). New York: Simon & Schuester, 2004. Stevenson, Robert Louis. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. New York: Bantam Classics, 1982. Read More

Frankenstein, having created something so hideous he can’t bear himself to look upon it, abandons his creation and allows it to enter the world unprotected, uncared for and misunderstood at every turn; essentially dooming his creature to eternal loneliness in his monstrosity. This feeling of utter disregard for the well-being of the created wells up immediately upon the creature’s first breath of life. “The beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.

Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room” (42). Frankenstein only agrees to discuss things with the monster once the threat has been made to his family, forcing the monster to violence as the only means to gain an ear. The creature Frankenstein creates is not as immediately obviously evil. The monster comes into life with a gentle spirit and a predilection for loving the natural things of the world. As the spring warmed the earth during the monster’s stay outside the De Lacey home where he gained the learning he should have gained from Frankenstein, the monster tells Frankenstein “my spirits were elevated by the enchanting appearance of nature; the past was blotted from my memory, the present was tranquil, and the future gilded by bright rays of hope and anticipations of joy” (119).

However, his monstrous appearance ensures he is chased from every possible place of refuge and human companionship. After he is chased even from this loving and patient home, the monster becomes possessed by thoughts of revenge against his creator for making him so unacceptable to any kind of company. Even in the silent places, the monster was unable to avoid negative human interaction, becoming injured as he struggles to save a woman from being swept away by a spring-fed stream. Thus, he becomes convinced that there is no where and no place for him to be happy as long as normal humans are present.

With his final hope for happiness thwarted in Frankenstein’s refusal to create a companion for him, the monster then dedicates himself completely to evil, primarily as it pertained to the family of Frankenstein. In the end, the creature tells Walton, ”I had cast off all feeling, subdued all anguish, to riot in the excess of my despair. Evil thenceforth became my good. Urged thus far, I had no choice but to adapt my nature to an element which I had willingly chosen” (239). Unlike Frankenstein’s monster, the evil in Mr.

Hyde is immediately apparent upon his first entrance into the story as the talk of the town after he trampled a young girl in the street. “It sounds like nothing to hear, but it was hellish to see. It wasn’t like a man, it was like some damned Juggernaut” (5). Because of the nature of Hyde’s appearance, this creation was left without any kind of conscience or other reason to restrain his actions and was thus free to commit any sort of evil he might choose to engage. Regardless of what the respectable and good-hearted Dr.

Jekyll might have felt about these actions, Hyde was capable of carrying them out without feeling any remorse or guilt. He is also able to completely throw himself into his evil as this same incident illustrates, “And next moment, with ape-like fury, he was trampling his victim under foot” (21). Like Frankenstein’s monster, the creature that emerges with the help of Dr. Jekyll’s potion takes on an evil appearance that marks him as evil. While this wasn’t necessarily the case in Frankenstein, it is more than evident within the character of Mr. Hyde. This man, much different from Dr.

Jekyll, appears as primitive to many people, even being referred to at one point as a troglodyte. This appearance was not tempered any by Mr. Hyde’s habitual interaction with others. In an age when manners and comportment were of primary importance in determining the worth of the individual, Mr. Hyde made it a point to forego such niceties. As Mr. Enfield tells Mr.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Tale of Victor Frankenstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words, n.d.)
Tale of Victor Frankenstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. https://studentshare.org/literature/1712604-dr-jekell-mr-hyde
(Tale of Victor Frankenstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Tale of Victor Frankenstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/literature/1712604-dr-jekell-mr-hyde.
“Tale of Victor Frankenstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”. https://studentshare.org/literature/1712604-dr-jekell-mr-hyde.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Tale of Victor Frankenstein

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

The main however is about a Doctor victor frankenstein who though born to a well-to-do and loving family, is over- ambitious and thirsts to prove himself.... Introduction Many literary critics consider Mary Shelley's frankenstein as one of the most impressive and imaginative Gothic horror novels of all times.... In the novel, Shelley managed to create one of the most phenomenal creatures in literary history: frankenstein monster.... frankenstein ill and he is nursed to health by Henry Cleval, a childhood friend....
10 Pages (2500 words) Movie Review

Is Frankenstein Guilty of Crimes Againts Nature

The vicious mistake that a reader can most likely commit while reading Mary Wollstonecraft Shelly's “frankenstein” is to interpret the protagonist's attempt to create life as an act of going against nature and the will of God.... The premise of frankenstein's crime.... nature is: “frankenstein is a rebel against nature when he tries not only to find the secret of life but also to remove lifes defects” (Rohrmoser 3).... Such proposition that like the mythological Prometheus, Doctor frankenstein is guilty of crimes against nature and God is But this proposition of frankenstein's crime against nature can be challenged by a simple rhetorical question, “Does frankenstein create a real monster?...
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature in the Real Monster

Name: Course: Tutor: Date: frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature is the Real Monster Introduction The common mistake that a reader often commit while reading Mary W.... Shelly's “frankenstein” is to assume Dr.... frankenstein's lab-made creature as a monster.... frankenstein has created, he is the real evil or the real monster.... frankenstein as a scientist who is good willed enough to discover the mystery of Nature in order to remove the imperfection is the monster; rather his disposition to abandon his creature (also his failure to socialize it) because of its ghastly appearance is the real monster in this case....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Frankensteins Attempt to Abandon the Creature Is the Real Monster

Name: Course: Tutor: Date: frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature is the Real Monster Introduction In the novel frankenstein, Mary Shelly attempts to humanize Dr.... frankenstein's lab-made creature as a giant.... frankenstein is the real culpable since he has created it ugly.... frankenstein is not only the creator of the monster.... Indeed, the victor's creature is initially a sociable one which yearns to have a companion, but he is betrayed by his creator....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

This is victor frankenstein's creature, and close behind is Dr.... Botting, Fred on his article in “The Manchester University Press” written in 1991 argues that victor frankenstein's life was destroyed because of an obsession with the power to create life that no one had tried before.... The researcher of this paper aims to discover "frankenstein” by Mary Shelley.... This paper analyzes Mary Shelley's "frankenstein”.... The paper "frankenstein by Mary Shelley" focuses on Mary Shelley's "frankenstein"....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Frankenstein Analyze a character

Leslie Tannenbaum (1977) first mooted a different idea, saying that the novel's mention of Paradise Lost was intended to highlight sarcastically victor frankenstein's "failures" as a maker, compared to Milton's more affectionate and dependable Holiness.... This new reading sees victor frankenstein as a blend of her father, her husband and the monster -- the novel's most sensitive character -- as a symbol of the author herself, the sufferer and the artifact of her father's liberal attitude....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Mary Shellys Monster in Frankenstein and Paradise Lost

The Book eight of Paradise Lost story narrates the tale of temptation that the Satan suffered with.... ccording to a quotation from Paradise Lost on the initial pages of frankenstein, Shelley sets the monster to read some line from Paradise Lost.... Apart from this, the portrayal of Shelley's monster also finds resemblance in the disposition of Satan from Paradise Lost; undeniably, the monster sympathizes with the story and role of Satan after reading the poem and develops empathy for himThe acts and exploitations of frankenstein, as well the monster created by him find a reference in Paradise Lost by John Milton....
5 Pages (1250 words) Book Report/Review

Frankenstein: The Misunderstood Monster

The essay 'frankenstein: The Misunderstood Monster' seeks to evaluate Mary Shelley's fictional character 'frankenstein's monster' in her novel 'The Modern Prometheus'.... It is observed that the Mary Shelley's frankenstein is always portrayed as the bad guy in all the movies.... The readers and literary critics widely believe that the birth of frankenstein was the outcome of the life events experienced by Mary Shelley and based on this belief we might come to the supposition that the male-dominated roles like Walton, Victor, Clerval and the monster were partly incidents of her own life that she presented in the novel....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us