StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery" discusses the period known as the Dark Ages in Ancient Greece that represents a transition period between the fall of a great many advanced civilizations and the establishment of polis city-states, a time period between approximately 1,200 and 700 B.C…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.1% of users find it useful
Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery"

Minoan Crete and mainland Mycenae form the crown jewel of second millennium b.c. Ancient Greece. Archaeologists have essentially dug up and recreateda culture from Bronze-Age Crete—extrapolating from the distinctive nature of sites at Mallia, Cnossos, Phaistos, and Zakro. What they have reconstructed is the former glory of a seemingly palatial society: one in which the magnificent Minoan palaces served as the highly complex and hierarchically structured centerpieces of administrative, religious, and economic activities in the state. Archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann excavated Mycenae, with Homer as his guide, uncovering traces of a powerful warrior society—with sites like Tiryns, Gla, and Orchomenos, surrounded by massive walls. Connecting these two civilizations was a series of tablets, written in so-called Linear B, which was translated by Michael Ventris in 1954. It is now clear that mainland Greeks occupied Cnossos, rebuilding it and residing there long enough to recreate the great palatial society. However, after the collapse of Minoa, Mycenaean power declined rapidly; a short time after 1,200 b.c., a series of events occurred which have been hotly contested in Ancient Greek archaeology. What caused the collapse of this great Bronze Age civilization? Some have suggested that it was a natural disaster, such as a volcanic eruption, or even a tidal wave. Others have suggested that invasions and military conquests brought an end to Mycenae. And yet another proposal is that internal revolts destroyed societies too fragile to resist. Answering this question of what happened to Mycenae is essential to answering the larger question of how we differentiate the Late Bronze Age from the Early Iron Age, or, what shall hereafter be called the “Dark Ages” of Ancient Greece. An examination of the passage of the Bronze Age will require a detailed examination of the vastly profound changes in Greek culture which occurred between 1,200 and 700 b.c. These changes concern a multitude of different aspects of such a culture, including political, religious, artistic, and philosophical changes brought on by the unknown disaster which occurred and launched Ancient Greece into dark times. It would also be instructive, in examining this transition, to look at the speed of recovery; that is, the time it took for Ancient Greece to return to a state of political and cultural stability. In doing so, we will draw a connection between the Early and later portions of the Iron Age: the birth of panhellenism. Nevertheless, it is the time between 1,200 and 700 b.c. that will be the focus of our present discussions—namely, the transition from bronze to iron in technology, and the emergence of a Dark Age, or, to describe it differently, an “Age of Heroes” with the rise of Homeric epic poetry. All things considered, this discussion will concentrate upon the aforementioned political and conventionalistic paradigm shifts that came about in the wake of the collapse of Bronze Age Ancient Greece: the general changes, specific changes, and, in summary, the fundamental discontinuities between the two which spell trouble for making a strong connection between the two and calling them “continuous” time periods. The Mycenaean civilization collapsed during the time period around 1,200 b.c. For a long time, the accepted theory of this collapse consisted of an invasion by Dorians, a warlike people that brought to Mycenae a new culture—and consequently, ushered in the Iron Age. Historians, however, are no longer certain of this theory’s verity. We know that Mycenae was a wealthy culture which obsessed over beautiful artefacts and gold, and that there existed a city of Troy which controlled the Dardanelles—as described in the Iliad—and this city was, of course, destroyed by siege. Archaeologists propose that such a decade-long war, ending in the defeat of Trojan forces, perhaps led to a progressive deterioration and inevitable collapse of Mycenae. Such a collapse, then, was not perpetrated and brought on by external invaders, but by the Mycenaean working class. Thus, perhaps the infamous “Dorian Invasion” was nothing more than an rebellion of peasants—the lower class who seized a chance to revolutionize their state. But although we cannot be sure of the nature—or cause—of this decline, what is absolutely certain is that it did occur. These two periods of time are united in some respect by their designations by historians. Metals, in antiquity, shaped the lives of individuals working under hard conditions, in both farming and warring. Iron is one of the latest of metals to come into use in the course of history. The transition into this age of iron was very gradual: in Greece, it was in progress in the Homeric age. Homer makes explicit mention of iron in the Iliad; however, iron in this context is typically spoken of in its agricultural applications (Homer, Iliad 1961). Bronze was still the constitutive material of helmets and weapons. In the Odyssey, progress in the common Ancient Greek utilization of iron seems to have been made: in one passage, a smith hardens iron by plunging the hot metal in water (Homer, Odyssey 1965). From Homer, the use of iron gradually spreads further. Eventually, iron is used for not only arms and utensils, but also for works of art, even. The city-state Sparta would even come to use iron currency, and the iron swords of Chalcis were praised in Aeschylus (Smith, Wayte and Marindin 1891, 166). We should now develop this enquiry into the reasoning behind the transition—it is not salient merely that it happened, or even how it happened, but why it happened is most important. For what reason did this replacement of bronze with iron occur for typically industrial or agricultural activities? Chiefly, bronze was preferably to iron in that its melting point is more achievable in ready terms than the melting point needed to cast iron. Thus, the Iron Age’s emergence is chiefly the result of better, more efficient smelting techniques. The benefits of iron over bronze consist of bronze’s requirement of copper and tin—elements that are not quite as readily available as iron, and the fact that iron is malleable by various techniques even after it has been formed; however, bronze can only be reshaped by reforging the metal. Anthony M. Snodgrass, in The Dark Age of Greece, argues that a shortage of tin made it preferable to develop alternatives to bronze. This shift in demand was caused, according to him, by disruptions in Mediterranean trade during this period. Consequently, bronze implements became recycled for other purposes (Snodgrass, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries B.C. 2000, 231). The complete replacement of bronze with iron did not happen until about 700 b.c., leaving in between the fall of Mycenae and the rise of the Greek polis almost four hundred years of an Age of Darkness, illuminated at times by the brilliant pieces of literature which came from this period, but kept silent by the lack of cohesion between the Greek peoples. What was the cause of this dissolution in relationships between peoples in large structured societies? The Dark Age political affiliation which replaced the rich, material civilization of the Mycenae was one of attachments between individuals in the household—structured around smaller social units dominated by chieftains and clan leaders—called the oikos. In the collapse of the large societies in the valleys, individuals took for the hills, taking their goats, sheep, cows, and so on with them. Individuals did this in order to escape marauders, pirates, and so on when life became uncertain, when social ties had become broken, and anarchy became inevitable. After 1,200, the great walls of Mycenae had fallen, the cities abandoned, and the population gone (somewhere). These oikos are the societies which dominate Dark Age Greece—in the beginning of the Iron Age—that differ from the elaborate Bronze Age societies of Minoa and Mycenae. Thus, we can identify a striking difference in the political structure of Greek civilization between these two times, and the Greek oikos would become, in the 5th century b.c., a model for the creation of the polis. With a political transition established, what other vast changes in lifestyle make it apparent that a profound change occurred at this time—between 1,200 and 1,100 b.c.? Besides the obvious replacement of bronze with iron that has already been discussed, many other differences arise. For one, the Early Iron Age seems to be an entirely illiterate age, to contrast with the Late Bronze Age that produced two distinct language systems in the centers of Aegean culture. Additionally, Hittite and Egyptian documents make quite detailed references to the Late Bronze Age cultures of Ancient Greece, and yet, are almost silent on the affairs of any Early Iron Age civilization in the region. By looking at the pottery of these two time periods, archaeologists recognize the “vital function of providing a chronological framework on which to hang any other scraps of knowledge that we can muster” (Snodgrass, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries B.C. 2000, 27), as it provides key clues into discussions of regional difference and social and economic interferences. In the last couple centuries of the Dark Ages (approximately 950 to 750 b.c.)—a time period called the Geometric period—a new abstract method of pottery decoration came into style. However, as Snodgrass argues, using pottery as a primary indicator of Dark Age culture in Greece, is “not helpful but dangerous”, and are not “the best divisions of cultural eras” (Snodgrass, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries B.C. 2000, 27). As an example to illustrate his claim, he points to the inability of pottery to provide a correct outer termini for the period, and that thus, attempts to distinguish internal periods based solely on pottery should not be trusted. So, although pottery is instructive in some respects, for the purposes of our discussion, the pottery of the Dark Ages itself will not be a chief concern. Sigrid Deger-Jalkotzy and Irene S. Lemos, in their book entitled Ancient Greece: From the Mycenaean Palaces to the Age of Homer, suggest that analyzing burial practices from the two eras could be helpful (accordingly, more helpful than exclusive use of pottery) in establishing the distinction between the two. In the Bronze Age, multiple burials were common in Mycenaean culture (Castleden 2005, 20). The adoption of single burial practices in the Dark Ages, according to Deger-Jalkotzy and Lemos, is “more probably [a reflection of] changes in the way that burial was used to reflect social ideology”. In addition, “the establishment of new cemetery areas… marks a break with the past… changes in the social order that were sufficiently significant for the establishment of new cemeteries to be chosen as one way to reflect them” (Deger-Jalkotzy and Lemos 2006, 119). The authors also cite cremation as another form of single burial that arose in the Early Iron Age. These burial patterns, most fundamentally, present picture of a lack of an established elite, which is a view consistent with the political situ observed above. Other artistic aspects of Ancient Greek culture provide clues about the transition from Bronze to Iron Age Greece. One might argue that the “historical reality” of the Late Bronze Age has no corollary in the Early Iron Age, “insofar as any legends can be argued to have their origins in these centuries, they are… utterly impoverished”. In terms of archaeology, this claim is valid in that the extensive collection of military conflict involved in the Late Bronze Age civilization does not continue into the Early Iron Age. That is, large-scale hostilities do not appear until almost the end of the Dark Age and the “use of monumental masonry… disappears for some centuries after the end of the Bronze Age” (Snodgrass, An Archaeology of Greece: An Introduction 1996). Culturally, this suggests that the new Greeks wished not to reproduce the idols which the Bronze Age Greeks worshipped: idols of brave fighters and honorable destruction. It seems that such man-worship momentarily ended upon the collapse of societies who possessed such reverences. There are additional cultural aspects of the seemingly disparateness, or discontinuity, between these two stages of Ancient Greek civilization. For one, already touched upon, is the fact there is no continuity in writing systems between the two. Although both stages spoke what is essentially the Greek language (an instance of identifiable continuity), the writing systems are completely incongruent, as we can tell from Linear B, and the practice of writing was lost for the Greeks in three centuries of the Dark Ages. In religious aspects, there is distinct discontinuity. Although various classical Greek gods and goddesses exist in the Mycenaean records, certain other gods and goddesses come from outside of Greece and are intermittently interwoven into the theistic system. In different respects, we might think of the cultures as continuous in that bronze-age royal palaces often became classical temples, devoted to gods; that is, although there is not religious continuity in the strict sense, there is continuity in the palatial sense. Even though certain locations remained sacred over time, the religious systems that endow the spot with sacred meaning might change. In the last paragraph, I mentioned that the Late Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age are “two stages”, instead of being two different, or two separate, civilizations—not continuous, and related only by the lineage of the people who formed these new oikos (household) states. Snodgrass argues that even while the Iron Age is clearly not continuous with the age preceding it, the Iron Age cannot merely be seen as a beginning of a new time period in the historical account of Greek civilization. We might regard this transformation, according to him, as a fundamental shift in attitudes, culture, and political structure—summarized aptly in the revolution of the “whole attitude to the heroic past that came about with the westward spread of Ionian epic” (Snodgrass, An Archaeology of Greece: An Introduction 1996, 172). Snodgrass continues on this line of thought by saying that the so-called “Heroic Age”, with its hero-worship, of the Late Bronze Age was linked, inextricably, to ancestor worship and “not tied to one specific past era”. The period known as the Dark Ages in Ancient Greece represents a transition period between the fall of a great many advanced civilizations and the establishment of polis city-states, a time period between approximately 1,200 and 700 b.c. There are many distinct discontinuities between the Bronze and Iron Ages, and we cannot properly distinguish a point wherein Mycenaean Greek civilization became classical Greek civilization. The fact of the matter is that there are irreconcilable differences in culture, politics, and religion between the two time periods, and thus, to use the word “transition” may not be apt. Nevertheless, we can still accurately and appropriately trace changes in various aspects of Greek life in making the loose connection between the two—using such artefacts as pottery, such practices and rites as burials, and tools of commerce, agriculture, and war. Chronologically, one can trace the end of the Bronze Age, and the beginning of widespread use of iron and the formation of recognizable city-states, and then simply fill in the gap between these points in time with the amorphous label “the Dark Ages”. Snodgrass considers the division between the two points to be a division of “an intellectual and spiritual kind”, and one based on deeply-rooted political and cultural premises. David Clarke has suggested that the chief objective of archaeology is “the development of higher category knowledge or principles that synthesize and correlate the material in hand while possessing a high predictive value” (Clarke 1968, 20). In our present case, we have differentiated between the two time periods, assigned comparative dates and figures to our classification, and defended this classification with extensive, well-documented archeological findings about Ancient Greek civilization. We have achieved “the development of higher category knowledge”; we have synthesized and correlated the material in hand; and, additionally, we have sufficient predictive value in many further claims about pre-classical Greece. Works Cited Carr, Karen Dr. Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery. November 10, 2006. http://www.historyforkids.org/learn/greeks/art/pottery/latebronze.htm (accessed October 29, 2008). Castleden, Rodney. Mycenaeans: Life in Bronze Age Greece. New York: Routledge, 2005. Clarke, D. L. Analytical Archaeology. London: R. Chapman, 1968. Deger-Jalkotzy, Sigrid, and Irene S. Lemos. Ancient Greece: From the Mycenaean Palaces to the Age of Homer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. Homer. Iliad. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961. —. Odyssey. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 1965. Smith, William, William Wayte, and George Edin Marindin. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. London: J. Murray, 1891. Snodgrass, Anthony M. An Archaeology of Greece: An Introduction. New York: Cornell University Press, 1996. —. The Dark Age of Greece: An Archeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries B.C. New York: Routledge, 2000. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words, n.d.)
Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/archaeology/1549191-which-are-the-significant-changes-we-can-observe-archaeologically-between-the-late-bronze-age-and-the-iron-age-and-when-would-you-place-them-in-absolute-chronological-terms
(Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words. https://studentshare.org/archaeology/1549191-which-are-the-significant-changes-we-can-observe-archaeologically-between-the-late-bronze-age-and-the-iron-age-and-when-would-you-place-them-in-absolute-chronological-terms.
“Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/archaeology/1549191-which-are-the-significant-changes-we-can-observe-archaeologically-between-the-late-bronze-age-and-the-iron-age-and-when-would-you-place-them-in-absolute-chronological-terms.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Late Bronze Age Greek Pottery

Architecture of the Greek Culture from the Middle Bronze Age through the Geometric Period

Author Tutor Course Date Architecture of the Greek Culture Introduction The Mycenaean Greece (1600-1100BC) represents a cultural period of bronze age deriving its name from the archeological site of Mycenae within the northeastern Argolis.... The Minoan civilizations (2600-1200 BC) The Minoan civilization represented a bronze age civilization that emanated from the island of Crete.... hellip; The Minoan represents the name given by contemporary historians to the people of ancient Crete (2800-1100 BC) known for detailed and richly decorated palaces, and pottery painted with marine and floral motifs....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

The Chronology of the Han Ceramics

On the basis of these data, archeologists presume that this pottery originated in the second and first centuries before our era, although it may well be that some pieces belong to the first century A.... A typical bowl-shaped vessel of Han pottery with oblique handle terminating in an animal's head, much resembling the cooking-vessel found on the stove (Cooper 38).... To obtain a clear understanding of this type, archeologists discuss two related bronze types of the same period....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Greek Dark Ages

Archeologists discovering pottery and other items from this age find a huge decline in the production of these goods.... The palaces, jewelry, pottery and tombs were all removed and most were no longer created.... All forms of art and pottery were broken down and their creation became non-existent in this New Greek era.... The greek Dark Ages is a period which refers to the period from the time of the presumed Dorian invasion and then end of Mycenaean Palatial Civilization which dates back to 1200 BCE to the beginning of the first greek City states which date back to 9 BCE....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Brief Outline for Ancient Greece History

he next major period of time in ancient Greece is known as the Early bronze age (2900 -2000).... The bronze age civilization is known by different titles throughout Greece but the most common was the Early Minoan period named after the king Minos.... It is also known as the period of time when pottery first made its appearance in ancient Greece.... he pottery and pottery fragments that have been discovered from that era seem to show that the pottery was not used for cooking or cleaning (holding water) but was instead used as status systems on display....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Ancient Greece and Magna Graecia

The new affluent class of consumers, who benefited from the trades, decorated their homes with luxury goods, such as bronzes statuettes, delicately carved furniture, sculptures made of stones and pottery with mold-made decorations.... The objective of the essay is to explore the influence of the greek civilizations on its colonies and to know how far the Hellenic civilization embraced the hue of the native culture and civilization.... The neo- Hellenic Art; the art which flourished in the greek colonies had no precedence in earlier greek art....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Contextualizing the Red Figure Column Krater

One of the most profound works of creative arts is pottery.... pottery has an unforgettable history ranging from traditional African use to Greek use, and pottery was deeply rooted in specific cultures.... Long time ago, pottery vessels would be used mainly for four functions.... With respect to the artwork under analysis, the Red Figure Column Krater is one form of pottery that has an outstanding history rooted in the culture and lifestyles of the Greeks (Museum of Fine Arts)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

External Trade in Cyprus during Late Bronze Age

The paper “External Trade in Cyprus during the late bronze age” discusses foreign trade of Cyprus, resulting in relations with the trading partners, and its economic, social, and cultural impacts on Cyprus.... During the late bronze age, Cyprus had been one of the most significant locations.... hellip; The author of the paper states that there are several reasons for lacking importance, such as insufficient information about Cyprus due to the fact that it was not mentioned enough in the written records about late bronze age, and that it was geographically separated from other important nations....
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

Greek Pottery Visual Analysis

This paper ''greek pottery Visual Analysis'' tells that one of the fascinating parts of the Greek histories is its pottery....             Geometric period was the very first stage of the greek pottery development....              An example of pottery created during the geometric period was the Heron Class Olla in c.... The lines are distributed equally on the pottery....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us